Bindert v. Mahoney
This text of 129 A.D.2d 1009 (Bindert v. Mahoney) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: We affirm for reasons stated in the memorandum decision of Justice Fudeman insofar as it holds that the requirements for a cover sheet contained in Election Law § 6-134 (2) and § 6-138 (2) are not inconsistent with the provisions of article 15 pertaining to village elections. (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Fudeman, J.—Election Law art 16.) Present—Doerr, J. P., Boomer, Pine, Lawton and Davis, JJ. (Order entered Mar. 6, 1987.)
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
129 A.D.2d 1009, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 45707, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bindert-v-mahoney-nyappdiv-1987.