Binder v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Binder v. City of New York

45 A.D.2d 840, 358 N.Y.S.2d 956, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4542

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 1, 1974

StatusPublished

This text of 45 A.D.2d 840 (Binder v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Binder v. City of New York, 45 A.D.2d 840, 358 N.Y.S.2d 956, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4542 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1974).

Pincite

Opinion

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, plaintiff appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, entered November 13, 1973, as (1) denied his motion to amend the ad damnum clause of his complaint from $100,000 to $1,000,000 and as, (2) upon reconsideration, denied his motion for a general preference. Order reversed insofar as appealed from, with $20 costs and disbursements, and motions to amend the ad damnum clause and for a general preference granted,. It is our opinion that, under the circumstances herein, the relief sought by plaintiff should have been granted. Hopkins, Acting P. J.,. Latham, Cohalan, Brennan and Munder, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injuries, plaintiff appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, entered November 13, 1973, as (1) denied his motion to amend the ad damnum clause of his complaint from $100,000 to $1,000,000 and as, (2) upon reconsideration, denied his motion for a general preference. Order reversed insofar as appealed from, with $20 costs and disbursements, and motions to amend the ad damnum clause and for a general preference granted,. It is our opinion that, under the circumstances herein, the relief sought by plaintiff should have been granted. Hopkins, Acting P. J.,. Latham, Cohalan, Brennan and Munder, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

45 A.D.2d 840, 358 N.Y.S.2d 956, 1974 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4542, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/binder-v-city-of-new-york-nyappdiv-1974.