Binder v. Ben Rubin, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Binder v. Ben Rubin, Inc.

259 A.D. 1021, 20 N.Y.S.2d 591, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7800

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 10, 1940·Published

Opinion

Order, entered on reargument, denying defendant’s motion to vacate a warrant of attachment, affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. We affirm the order on the ground that plaintiff made a sufficient showing that defendant is about to dispose of its property with intent to defraud creditors. (Wildman v. Van Gelder, 60 Hun, 443.) The casé should be tried without further delay. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Johnston, Taylor and Close, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, entered on reargument, denying defendant’s motion to vacate a warrant of attachment, affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. We affirm the order on the ground that plaintiff made a sufficient showing that defendant is about to dispose of its property with intent to defraud creditors. (Wildman v. Van Gelder, 60 Hun, 443.) The casé should be tried without further delay. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Johnston, Taylor and Close, JJ., concur.

Binder v. Ben Rubin, Inc., 259 A.D. 1021, 20 N.Y.S.2d 591, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7800 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1940).

Pincite

259 A.D. 1021 (Binder v. Ben Rubin, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related