Binder v. Ben Rubin, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Binder v. Ben Rubin, Inc.

259 A.D. 1021, 20 N.Y.S.2d 591, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7800

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 10, 1940

StatusPublished

This text of 259 A.D. 1021 (Binder v. Ben Rubin, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Binder v. Ben Rubin, Inc., 259 A.D. 1021, 20 N.Y.S.2d 591, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7800 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1940).

Pincite

Opinion

Order, entered on reargument, denying defendant’s motion to vacate a warrant of attachment, affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. We affirm the order on the ground that plaintiff made a sufficient showing that defendant is about to dispose of its property with intent to defraud creditors. (Wildman v. Van Gelder, 60 Hun, 443.) The casé should be tried without further delay. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Johnston, Taylor and Close, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, entered on reargument, denying defendant’s motion to vacate a warrant of attachment, affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. We affirm the order on the ground that plaintiff made a sufficient showing that defendant is about to dispose of its property with intent to defraud creditors. (Wildman v. Van Gelder, 60 Hun, 443.) The casé should be tried without further delay. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Johnston, Taylor and Close, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

259 A.D. 1021, 20 N.Y.S.2d 591, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7800, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/binder-v-ben-rubin-inc-nyappdiv-1940.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack