Bin Lin v. Holder

456 F. App'x 273
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided November 30, 2011·No. No. 10-2140·Published

Opinion

Petition denied by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Bin Lin, a native and citizen of China, petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) denying his motion to reopen as untimely and numerically barred. We have reviewed the administrative record and Lin’s claims and find no abuse of discretion in the denial of relief on his motion. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(a), (c) (2011). We accordingly deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. See In re: Lin (B.I.A. Sept. 13, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bin Lin v. Holder, 456 F. App'x 273 (4th Cir. 2011).

456 F. App'x 273 (Bin Lin v. Holder) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related