Bimberg v. Rothenfeld

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Bimberg v. Rothenfeld

233 A.D. 861

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 15, 1931

StatusPublished

This text of 233 A.D. 861 (Bimberg v. Rothenfeld) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bimberg v. Rothenfeld, 233 A.D. 861 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1931).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion to dismiss appeal granted, with ten dollars costs, and appeal dismissed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. The moving papers indicate no defense to the first cause of action. The defenses and counterclaims pertain to the second cause of action only. There is, therefore, no merit in the appeal and the order of severance is correct. Furthermore, appellants were dilatory in perfecting the appeal. Present — Lazar.sky, P. J., Kapper, Seudder, Tompkins and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion to dismiss appeal granted, with ten dollars costs, and appeal dismissed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. The moving papers indicate no defense to the first cause of action. The defenses and counterclaims pertain to the second cause of action only. There is, therefore, no merit in the appeal and the order of severance is correct. Furthermore, appellants were dilatory in perfecting the appeal. Present — Lazar.sky, P. J., Kapper, Seudder, Tompkins and Davis, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

233 A.D. 861, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bimberg-v-rothenfeld-nyappdiv-1931.