Bilzerian v. Ignite International Brands, LTD.
This text of Bilzerian v. Ignite International Brands, LTD. (Bilzerian v. Ignite International Brands, LTD.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Nevada primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1 | GARMAN TURNER GORDON LLP ERIC R. OLSEN 2 || Nevada Bar No. 3127 ERIKA PIKE TURNER 3 || Nevada Bar No. 6454 STEVEN E. KISH III 4 || Nevada Bar No. 15257 7251 Amigo Street, Suite 210 5 || Las Vegas, Nevada 89119 Tel: (725) 777-3000 6 || Fax: (725) 777-3112 Email: eolsen@gtg.legal 7 eturner@gtg.legal skish@gtg.legal 8 || Attorneys for Defendants Ignite International, Ltd., Scott Rohleder, 9 || and Ignite International Brands, Ltd. 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 12 || DAN BRANDON BILZERIAN, an individual, | CASE NO.: 2:24-cv-02101-RFB-NJK 13 Plaintiff, 14 V. ORDER TO EXTEND IGNITE 15 || IGNITE INTERNATIONAL BRANDS, INTERNATIONAL BRANDS. LTD.’S LTD., a Foreign Corporation; IGNITE DEADLINE TO FILE RESPONSE TO 16 || INTERNATIONAL, LTD., Foreign PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT Corporation, PAUL BILZERIAN, an 17 || individual; SCOTT ROHLEDER, an (FIRST REQUEST) 18 individual; RUPY DHADWAR, an individual, Defendants. 19 20 Pursuant to Local Rules, Plaintiff, DAN BRANDON BILZERIAN (‘Plaintiff’), and 21 || Defendant, IGNITE INTERNATIONAL BRANDS, LTD. (‘Ignite Brands” or “Defendant”, 22 || together with Plaintiff the “Parties”), through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate and agree 23 || as follows: 24 Ignite shall have until April 24, 2025 to file their responsive pleadings to □□□□□□□□□□□ 25 || Complaint.' 26 27 | 7 Ges □ Based on the initial Stipulation [ECF 44] lodged on April 15, 2025, Ignite Brands filed a Motion to Dismiss [ECF 47], on April 16, 2025. 28
1 of 3
1 As required by LR IA 6-1, Defendant’s counsel states that the failure to file the stipulation 2 || to extend before the deadline was the result the attorney’s excusable neglect, and says: 1) there is 3 || no danger of prejudice to the Plaintiff, especially in light of pending motions to dismiss by all other 4 || Defendants; 2) there is no impact due to a seven day delay between the deadline and the filing; 3) 5 || the reason for the delay was counsel’s misapprehension that the only attempted service on the 6 || Canadian company had been disputed the service in Texas until Plaintiff's counsel confirmed on 7 || April 10, 2025, re-service occurred in Canada on March 18, 2025 (making the responsive pleading 8 || due April 8") and agreed to an extension until April 24,2025 (although Plaintiffs counsel would 9 || not return to his office on April 14, 2025), and both counsel agreed to the stipulation to extend on 10 || April 14"", which Defendant’s counsel lodged with the Court on April 15, 2025; 4) Defendant acted 11 || in good faith and without any intent to delay.” 12 Plaintiff takes no position on excusable neglect and expressly reserves all rights, remedies, 13 || defenses, objections, and legal arguments. Plaintiff also contends that service in Texas was valid; 14 || however, out of abundance of caution, he decided to re-serve the Defendant in Canada. 15 vee 16 || ... 17 ||... 18 || ... 19 || ... 20 || ... 21 vee 22 || ... 23 || ... 24 || ... 25 vee 26 || ... 27 28 ? See, Briones v. Riviera Hotel & Casino, 116 F.3d 379, 381 (9th Cir. 1997).
9% of 3
This is the Parties’ first request for extension of time this deadline, and it is not intended to 2 || cause any delay or prejudice to any party. 3 IT IS SO STIPULATED. 4 || Dated this 18"* day of April 2025. Dated this 18" day of April 2025. 5 GARMAN TURNER GORDON LLP THE MEDRALA LAW FIRM, PROF. LLC 6 /s/ Eric R. Olsen [s/ Jakub P. Medrala 7 ERIC R. OLSEN JAKUB P. MEDRALA Nevada Bar No. 3127 Nevada Bar No. 12822 8 ERIKA PIKE TURNER 615 S. 6th Street Nevada Bar No. 6454 Las Vegas, Nevada 89101 9 STEVEN E. KISH II Attorneys for Plaintiff Nevada Bar No. 15257 10 7251 Amigo Street, Suite 210 Las Vegas, Nevada 89119 11 Attorneys for Defendants Ignite International, Ltd., Scott Rohleder, 12 and Ignite International Brands, Ltd. 13 14 15 16 17 ORDER 1 IT IS SO ORDERED:
2 Nancy J. Re She ) United States Magistrate Judge 2 DATED: April 21, 2025 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
3o0f3
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bilzerian v. Ignite International Brands, LTD., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bilzerian-v-ignite-international-brands-ltd-nvd-2025.