Biloxi Casino Corp. v. Wolf
900 So. 2d 734, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 5989, 2005 WL 957606
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 27, 2005·No. No. 4D04-1977·Published·Cited by 5 cases
Opinion
Upon Appellee’s concession of error, we reverse an order denying Appellant’s motion for proceedings supplementary to execution. Appellant has a valid outstanding judgment lien. Appellant filed an affidavit stating that the judgment remains unsatisfied. Appellant is entitled to proceedings supplementary pursuant to section 56.29, Florida Statutes. Upon a showing of the statutory prerequisites, the court has no discretion to deny the motion.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Biloxi Casino Corp. v. Wolf, 900 So. 2d 734, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 5989, 2005 WL 957606 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).
900 So. 2d 734 (Biloxi Casino Corp. v. Wolf) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Lianski v. Las Mercedes Restaurant, Inc.
S.D. Florida, 2021
FREDERICK LONGO v. ASSOCIATED LIMOUSINE SERVICES, INC. and LIMOUSINE MANAGEMENT, INC.
236 So. 3d 1115 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2018)
BIEL REO, LLC v. Barefoot Cottages Development etc.
156 So. 3d 506 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2014)
Okaloosa New Opportunity, LLC v. LD Projects, LLC
109 So. 3d 1209 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2013)
Moffatt & Nichol, Inc. v. B.E.A. International Corp.
48 So. 3d 896 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2010)