Biloxi Casino Corp. v. Wolf

900 So. 2d 734, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 5989, 2005 WL 957606
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 27, 2005
DocketNo. 4D04-1977
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 900 So. 2d 734 (Biloxi Casino Corp. v. Wolf) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Biloxi Casino Corp. v. Wolf, 900 So. 2d 734, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 5989, 2005 WL 957606 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon Appellee’s concession of error, we reverse an order denying Appellant’s motion for proceedings supplementary to execution. Appellant has a valid outstanding judgment lien. Appellant filed an affidavit stating that the judgment remains unsatisfied. Appellant is entitled to proceedings supplementary pursuant to section 56.29, Florida Statutes. Upon a showing of the statutory prerequisites, the court has no discretion to deny the motion.

STONE, KLEIN and GROSS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

FREDERICK LONGO v. ASSOCIATED LIMOUSINE SERVICES, INC. and LIMOUSINE MANAGEMENT, INC.
236 So. 3d 1115 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2018)
BIEL REO, LLC v. Barefoot Cottages Development etc.
156 So. 3d 506 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2014)
Okaloosa New Opportunity, LLC v. LD Projects, LLC
109 So. 3d 1209 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2013)
Moffatt & Nichol, Inc. v. B.E.A. International Corp.
48 So. 3d 896 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
900 So. 2d 734, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 5989, 2005 WL 957606, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/biloxi-casino-corp-v-wolf-fladistctapp-2005.