Bilotta v. Saul

District Court, W.D. North Carolina·Decided September 15, 2021·No. 5:18-cv-00121·Unknown

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA STATESVILLE DIVISION ANTONIO BILOTTA, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) Civil No. 5:18-CV-121-FDW-DSC KILOLO KIJAKAZI, ) Acting Commissioner of Social Security, ) ) Defendant. )

ORDER Plaintiff's counsel filed a Motion for approval of attorney’s fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b), in the amount of $28,444.50. Attorney’s fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b) are paid from past due benefits awarded to a successful claimant. Plaintiff has been awarded attorney’s fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412, in the amount of $20,000. Defendant filed a response, stating that under Gisbrecht v. Barnhart, 535 U.S. 789 (2002), it is the duty of the Court to determine a reasonable fee. It is ORDERED that Plaintiff's counsel be awarded fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b) in the amount of $28,444.50. Plaintiff’s counsel will refund to Plaintiff the smaller sum as between this amount and the EAJA award. SO ORDERED. Signed: September 15, 2021

David S. Cayer : i-f United States Magistrate Judge ae

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bilotta v. Saul, (W.D.N.C. 2021).

Bilotta v. Saul (Bilotta v. Saul) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gisbrecht v. Barnhart
535 U.S. 789 (Supreme Court, 2002)