Bilotta v. Commander, 3d Infantry Division, United States Army

22 C.M.A. 665
United States Court of Military Appeals·Decided September 24, 1973·No. No. 73-50·Published

Opinion

On consideration of the Petition for Extraordinary Relief and of the Reply to Order to Show Cause filed in the above-entitled action, it appearing that the convening authority has acted upon the record of petitioner’s trial by general court-martial, as required by Article 60, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 860, and said record has been referred to the United States Army Court of Military Review for further review pursuant to Article 66(b), Uniform Code, supra, 10 USC 866(b), it is, by the Court, this 24th day of September 1973,

ORDERED:

That said petition be, and the same hereby is, dismissed as moot. Rhoades v. Haynes, 22 USCMA 189, 46 CMR 189 (1973).

This action is without prejudice to the right of petitioner to raise the same issue by appropriate assignment of error before the Court of Military Review.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bilotta v. Commander, 3d Infantry Division, United States Army, 22 C.M.A. 665 (cma 1973).

22 C.M.A. 665 (Bilotta v. Commander, 3d Infantry Division, United States Army) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related