Billy Wilson v. the State of Texas

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJanuary 21, 2022
Docket07-21-00312-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Billy Wilson v. the State of Texas (Billy Wilson v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Billy Wilson v. the State of Texas, (Tex. Ct. App. 2022).

Opinion

In The Court of Appeals Seventh District of Texas at Amarillo

No. 07-21-00312-CR

BILLY WILSON, APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE

On Appeal from the 140th District Court Lubbock County, Texas Trial Court No. 2018-451,802, Honorable Douglas H. Freitag, Presiding

January 21, 2022 MEMORANDUM OPINION Before PIRTLE and PARKER and DOSS, JJ.

Appellant, Billy Wilson, attempts to appeal the trial court’s pretrial Judgment on

Competency. Appellant was indicted for robbery. On December 7, 2021, a jury found

Appellant competent to stand trial. The trial court entered a judgment on the jury’s verdict

and this appeal followed. We now dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.

We have jurisdiction to consider an appeal by a criminal defendant only from a

judgment of conviction or where appellate jurisdiction has been expressly granted by law. See Abbott v. State, 271 S.W.3d 694, 696-97 (Tex. Crim. App. 2008). A pretrial judgment

of competency to stand trial is neither a judgment of conviction nor an order made

immediately appealable by statute. See TEX. CODE. CRIM. PROC. ANN. § 46B.011

(providing that neither the State nor a criminal defendant may make an interlocutory

appeal relating to a determination or ruling on the issue of a defendant’s competency to

stand trial); but cf. TEX. HEALTH & SAFETY CODE ANN. § 574.070 (permitting appeals from

certain commitment proceedings after a finding of incompetency).

By letter of December 28, 2021, we directed Appellant’s counsel to show how we

have jurisdiction over the appeal by January 7, 2022. Appellant has not filed a response

or had any further communication with this Court to date.

Because Appellant has not presented this Court with a judgment of conviction or

an appealable order, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.

Per Curiam

Do not publish.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Abbott v. State
271 S.W.3d 694 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Billy Wilson v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/billy-wilson-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2022.