Billy Watson v. Magnolia at Mesquite Creek
Opinion
Dismissed and Opinion Filed October 27, 2015
In The C!rourt of App:ealn !Jiiftlt ilintrid of W:exan at italian No. 05-15-00680-CV
BILLY WATSON, Appellant V. MAGNOLIA AT MESQUITE CREEK, Appellee
On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 5 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC-15-02285-E
MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Lang, Evans, and Whitehill Opinion by Justice Whitehill Appellant's brief is overdue. By postcard dated June 30,2015, we notified appellant the
reporter's record was filed, which in accordance with TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(a) triggered the
briefing deadline. In response to the court's notice, appellant notified the court on July 28, 2015
that he would provide an updated mailing address. No updated mailing address has been
received to date. By postcard dated August 10, 2015, we notified appellant, at his address of
record, the time for filing his brief had expired. We directed appellant to file both his brief and
an extension motion within ten days. We cautioned appellant that failure to file his brief and an
extension motion would result in the dismissal of this appeal without further notice. The
postcard was not returned as undeliverable. To date, appellant has not filed his brief, an
RECEIVED IN r":OURT OF APPEALS, 5th OIST.
WJV 1 6 2015 LiSA MATZ CLERK, 5th DISTRICT extension motion, or otherwise corresponded with the Court regarding the status of his brief or
his updated mailing address.
Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a)(l); 42.3(b)(c).
150680F .P05 /Bill Whitehill/ BILL WHITEHILL JUSTICE
-2- Qrourt of Appeals 111ifti1 llintrid of W.exan at llallan -JUDGMENT
BILLY WATSON, Appellant On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 5, Dallas County, Texas No. 05-15-00680-CV V. Trial Court Cause No. CC-15-02285-E. Opinion delivered by Justice Whitehill. MAGNOLIA AT MESQUITE CREEK, Justices Lang and Evans participating. Appellee
In accordance with this Court's opinion of this date, the appeal is DISMISSED.
It is ORDERED that appellee Magnolia at Mesquite Creek recover its costs, if any, of this appeal from appellant Billy Watson.
Judgment entered October 27, 2015.
-3-
CASE: 0}-fS-00680-CV BILL Y/'W ATSON 904 F A .3 r;J: xr: :r \"• ,.,1 h 'l;,r' F ce:2 l .._ •>t ~
ESQ R::TUR~~ () --: 52,NDER .4 '!T=~~;, "Tp;:) NOT ~:~NU~¥N ~-;. NABL~ TQ =ORWARD 7514::::1$8100 '"' ,... Q .._" 75202663~50 *~734-8~870-28-44 7 52 02 @663 ~ qqHt;~ldHl iiidHi~idl!1Pid I;L;L!~ ~~pp!i.q!} ~ d
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Billy Watson v. Magnolia at Mesquite Creek (Billy Watson v. Magnolia at Mesquite Creek) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.