Billy Ray Square v. Wayne v. Gay Elton R. Coley Eric Barnes Cathy Dewald Keith Barnes

73 F.3d 358, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 4180, 1996 WL 2272
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 4, 1996
Docket95-7084
StatusPublished

This text of 73 F.3d 358 (Billy Ray Square v. Wayne v. Gay Elton R. Coley Eric Barnes Cathy Dewald Keith Barnes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Billy Ray Square v. Wayne v. Gay Elton R. Coley Eric Barnes Cathy Dewald Keith Barnes, 73 F.3d 358, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 4180, 1996 WL 2272 (4th Cir. 1996).

Opinion

73 F.3d 358
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Billy Ray SQUARE, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Wayne V. GAY; Elton R. Coley; Eric Barnes; Cathy Dewald;
Keith Barnes, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 95-7084.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 14, 1995.
Decided Jan. 4, 1996.

Billy Ray Square, Appellant Pro Se.

Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court order dismissing one Defendant named in his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint but allowing the action to proceed against other Defendants. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the order is not appealable. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 (1988), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1292 (1988); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The order here appealed is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order.

We dismiss the appeal as interlocutory. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.
337 U.S. 541 (Supreme Court, 1949)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
73 F.3d 358, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 4180, 1996 WL 2272, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/billy-ray-square-v-wayne-v-gay-elton-r-coley-eric--ca4-1996.