Billy R. High and Traci High-Ward v. National Royalty Company LTD and Marlin Royalty Company
This text of Billy R. High and Traci High-Ward v. National Royalty Company LTD and Marlin Royalty Company (Billy R. High and Traci High-Ward v. National Royalty Company LTD and Marlin Royalty Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS
No. 10-18-00349-CV
BILLY R. HIGH AND TRACI HIGH-WARD, Appellants v.
NATIONAL ROYALTY COMPANY LTD AND MARLIN ROYALTY COMPANY, Appellees
From the 77th District Court Freestone County, Texas Trial Court No. 17-420-B
ORDER
Appellants Billy R. High and Traci High-Ward are notified by this Order that this
appeal is subject to dismissal for want of jurisdiction because it appears that all pending
parties and claims have not been disposed of and that the trial court has not signed a final
judgment or other appealable order. Appellants have indicated in the documents that
they have filed in this Court that the trial court rendered judgment on August 21, 2018
that “Plaintiff takes nothing.” However, the clerk’s record, which was filed on December
13, 2018, contains no such final judgment. The clerk’s record does contain an “Order Granting Defendants’ Motion for Instructed Verdict” that was signed by the trial court
on August 21, 2018, but that order does not appear to be a final judgment or other
appealable order.
This Court has no jurisdiction to hear an appeal from a judgment that is not final,
unless there is specific statutory authority permitting an appeal before final judgment.
See TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE ANN. § 51.012. None of the exceptions to the rule that
only final judgments can be appealed applies in this case. See id. § 51.014 (listing
interlocutory judgments that may be appealed before final judgment is rendered).
Therefore, the Court may dismiss this appeal unless, within 10 days from the date of this
Order, a response is filed showing grounds for continuing the appeal.
PER CURIAM
Before Chief Justice Gray, Justice Davis, and Justice Neill Order issued and filed April 3, 2019
High v. Nat’l Royalty Co. Page 2
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Billy R. High and Traci High-Ward v. National Royalty Company LTD and Marlin Royalty Company, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/billy-r-high-and-traci-high-ward-v-national-royalty-company-ltd-and-texapp-2019.