Billy Jack Guerra v. State
Opinion
Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas September 14, 2016
No. 04-16-00462-CR
Billy Jack GUERRA, Appellant
v.
The STATE of Texas, Appellee
From the 144th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2016CR1777 Honorable Lorina I. Rummel, Judge Presiding
ORDER Appellant has filed a pro se motion to dismiss his appeal. Appellant is represented by counsel. In Texas, appellants do not have a right to hybrid representation. See Ex parte Taylor, 36 S.W.3d 883, 889 (Tex. (Tex. Crim. App. App. 2001); Rudd v. State, 616 S.W.2d 623, 625 (Tex. Crim. App. 1981). Therefore, appellant’s motion is DENIED.
_________________________________ Jason Pulliam, Justice
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 14th day of September, 2016.
___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle Clerk of Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Billy Jack Guerra v. State (Billy Jack Guerra v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.