Billy Guice and Howard Claxton, Sr. v. Ray Fortenberry, Superintendent East Carroll Parish Prison Farm

642 F.2d 98, 1981 U.S. App. LEXIS 18856
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedMarch 26, 1981
Docket80-3350
StatusPublished

This text of 642 F.2d 98 (Billy Guice and Howard Claxton, Sr. v. Ray Fortenberry, Superintendent East Carroll Parish Prison Farm) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Billy Guice and Howard Claxton, Sr. v. Ray Fortenberry, Superintendent East Carroll Parish Prison Farm, 642 F.2d 98, 1981 U.S. App. LEXIS 18856 (5th Cir. 1981).

Opinion

BY THE COURT:

A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the application for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that the cause shall be reheard by the Court en banc on briefs without oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
642 F.2d 98, 1981 U.S. App. LEXIS 18856, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/billy-guice-and-howard-claxton-sr-v-ray-fortenberry-superintendent-east-ca5-1981.