Billy Guice and Howard Claxton, Sr. v. Ray Fortenberry, Superintendent East Carroll Parish Prison Farm

Fifth Circuit

Billy Guice and Howard Claxton, Sr. v. Ray Fortenberry, Superintendent East Carroll Parish Prison Farm

642 F.2d 98, 1981 U.S. App. LEXIS 18856

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided March 26, 1981·No. 80-3350·Published

Opinion

BY THE COURT:

A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the application for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that the cause shall be reheard by the Court en banc on briefs without oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BY THE COURT:

A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the application for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that the cause shall be reheard by the Court en banc on briefs without oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.

Billy Guice and Howard Claxton, Sr. v. Ray Fortenberry, Superintendent East Carroll Parish Prison Farm, 642 F.2d 98, 1981 U.S. App. LEXIS 18856 (5th Cir. 1981).

Pincite

642 F.2d 98 (Billy Guice and Howard Claxton, Sr. v. Ray Fortenberry, Superintendent East Carroll Parish Prison Farm) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.