Billy Grice v. United States

567 F.2d 628, 1978 U.S. App. LEXIS 12704
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 8, 1978
Docket77-2245
StatusPublished

This text of 567 F.2d 628 (Billy Grice v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Billy Grice v. United States, 567 F.2d 628, 1978 U.S. App. LEXIS 12704 (5th Cir. 1978).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

In this appeal from the denial of a section 2255 1 motion to vacate sentence, petitioner contends that the district court lacked authority, in sentencing petitioner after conviction of multiple counts, 2 to impose concurrent prison sentences and cumulative fines (which, in total, exceeded the fine that could have been imposed on any given count.) While this court has not previously been called upon to consider the propriety of such sentencing, we have expressly noted its practice in this circuit, see United States v. Scott, 555 F.2d 522, 525 n. 1 (5th Cir.) cert, denied,-U.S.-, 98 S.Ct. 610, 54 L.Ed.2d 478 (1977); United States v. Parr, 509 F.2d 1381, 1383 (5th Cir. 1975) and we fail to perceive its claimed statutory or constitutional invalidity in a case such as this one. Finding petitioner’s remaining contentions to be meritless, we affirm the judgment of the district court.

AFFIRMED.

1

. 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1970).

2

. He was charged and convicted of offenses under 18 U.S.C. §§ 371, 641, and 2314 (1970).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. George B. Parr
509 F.2d 1381 (Fifth Circuit, 1975)
California v. United States
434 U.S. 984 (Supreme Court, 1977)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
567 F.2d 628, 1978 U.S. App. LEXIS 12704, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/billy-grice-v-united-states-ca5-1978.