Billy E. Baker v. State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 10, 2026·No. 3D2026-0549·Published

Opinion

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

Opinion filed June 10, 2026.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

No. 3D26-0549

Lower Tribunal No. 18-CF-97-A-K

Billy E. Baker,

Petitioner,

vs.

State of Florida,

Respondent.

A Case of Original Jurisdiction – Petition for Belated Appeal.

Billy E. Baker, in proper person.

James Uthmeier, Attorney General, and Yolande M. Samerson, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.

Before LINDSEY, LOBREE, and GOODEN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner Billy E. Baker seeks a belated appeal of the denial of his Rule 3.850 motion. But his petition was not sworn—as required by Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(c)(4). And so, it is facially insufficient. Therefore, we deny the petition without prejudice to file a properly sworn petition. See Adams v. State, 302 So. 3d 851 (Fla. 3d DCA 2020); Green v. State, 941 So. 2d 1250 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006); Popp v. State, 935 So. 2d 93 (Fla. 5th DCA 2006).

Denied without prejudice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Billy E. Baker v. State of Florida, (Fla. Ct. App. 2026).

Billy E. Baker v. State of Florida (Billy E. Baker v. State of Florida) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Green v. State
941 So. 2d 1250 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)
Popp v. State
935 So. 2d 93 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)