Billy Carr Chevrolet, Inc. v. Debis Financial Services, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Billy Carr Chevrolet, Inc. v. Debis Financial Services, Inc.

935 So. 2d 595, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 13189, 2006 WL 2251948

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 8, 2006·No. No. 1D06-0950·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the appellant’s response to the Court’s order of April 4, [596]*5962006, the Court has determined that Count II of the Third Amended Complaint, for tortious interference with a business relationship, is related to Count I for holdover rent and damages, to such a degree that the January 25, 2006, Final Judgment as to Count II, does not constitute a partial final judgment subject to immediate review pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.110(k). Accordingly, the appeal is hereby dismissed as premature.

ERVIN, WEBSTER, and BENTON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the appellant’s response to the Court’s order of April 4, [596]*5962006, the Court has determined that Count II of the Third Amended Complaint, for tortious interference with a business relationship, is related to Count I for holdover rent and damages, to such a degree that the January 25, 2006, Final Judgment as to Count II, does not constitute a partial final judgment subject to immediate review pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.110(k). Accordingly, the appeal is hereby dismissed as premature.

ERVIN, WEBSTER, and BENTON, JJ., concur.

Billy Carr Chevrolet, Inc. v. Debis Financial Services, Inc., 935 So. 2d 595, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 13189, 2006 WL 2251948 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

935 So. 2d 595 (Billy Carr Chevrolet, Inc. v. Debis Financial Services, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.