Billups v. City of Birmingham

Alabama Court of Appeals

Billups v. City of Birmingham

134 So. 2d 215, 41 Ala. App. 318, 1961 Ala. App. LEXIS 360

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedMay 30, 1961

Docket6 Div. 795

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 134 So. 2d 215 (Billups v. City of Birmingham) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Billups v. City of Birmingham, 134 So. 2d 215, 41 Ala. App. 318, 1961 Ala. App. LEXIS 360 (Ala. Ct. App. 1961).

Pincite

Opinion

PRICE, Judge.

This is a companion case to that of Shuttlesworth v. City of Birmingham, post, p. 319, 134 So.2d 213.

The facts set out in the Shuttlesworth case are adopted as the facts of this case, with this additional statement: “On March 30, 1960, Rev. Billups went to Daniel Payne College, in a car, where he picked up one James Albert Davis, a student, and carried him to the home of Rev. F. L. Shuttles-worth, where several people had gathered, among them Rev. Shuttlesworth, his wife, and several other students from Daniel Payne College. Rev. Billups was also at said meeting.” Under this testimony the jury was fully justified in finding that this defendant was part and parcel of the entire scheme.

On the authority of Shuttlesworth v. City of Birmingham, supra, the judgment is due to be, and hereby is, affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PRICE, Judge.

This is a companion case to that of Shuttlesworth v. City of Birmingham, post, p. 319, 134 So.2d 213.

The facts set out in the Shuttlesworth case are adopted as the facts of this case, with this additional statement: “On March 30, 1960, Rev. Billups went to Daniel Payne College, in a car, where he picked up one James Albert Davis, a student, and carried him to the home of Rev. F. L. Shuttles-worth, where several people had gathered, among them Rev. Shuttlesworth, his wife, and several other students from Daniel Payne College. Rev. Billups was also at said meeting.” Under this testimony the jury was fully justified in finding that this defendant was part and parcel of the entire scheme.

On the authority of Shuttlesworth v. City of Birmingham, supra, the judgment is due to be, and hereby is, affirmed.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

134 So. 2d 215, 41 Ala. App. 318, 1961 Ala. App. LEXIS 360, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/billups-v-city-of-birmingham-alactapp-1961.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack