Bills v. Delta Mercantile Co.

Utah Supreme Court

Bills v. Delta Mercantile Co.

261 P. 452, 70 Utah 516, 1927 Utah LEXIS 55

CourtUtah Supreme Court

DecidedOctober 15, 1927

DocketNo. 4514.

StatusPublished

This text of 261 P. 452 (Bills v. Delta Mercantile Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Utah Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bills v. Delta Mercantile Co., 261 P. 452, 70 Utah 516, 1927 Utah LEXIS 55 (Utah 1927).

Pincite

Opinion

GIDEON, J.

This case, by stipulation of counsel, was consolidated for the purpose of trial in the lower court and presentation and submission to this court with the case of Sorensen v. Bills, 261 P. 450, just decided. The same facts are involved in *517 both. The judgment in the one controls the judgment in the other.

For the reasons assigned in Sorensen v. Bills, the judgment in the present case is affirmed, with costs taxed against appellant.

THURMAN, C. J., and CHERRY, STRAUP, and HANSEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

GIDEON, J.

This case, by stipulation of counsel, was consolidated for the purpose of trial in the lower court and presentation and submission to this court with the case of Sorensen v. Bills, 261 P. 450, just decided. The same facts are involved in *517 both. The judgment in the one controls the judgment in the other.

For the reasons assigned in Sorensen v. Bills, the judgment in the present case is affirmed, with costs taxed against appellant.

THURMAN, C. J., and CHERRY, STRAUP, and HANSEN, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

261 P. 452, 70 Utah 516, 1927 Utah LEXIS 55, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bills-v-delta-mercantile-co-utah-1927.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack