Billos v. Kozlowski

205 Ill. App. 285
Appellate Court of Illinois·Decided April 16, 1917·No. Gen. No. 22,812·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Mr. Presiding Justice McSurely

delivered the opinion of the court.

2. Damages, § 85*—what is nature oí money deposited By tenant as security for rent. Money deposited by a tenant as security for rent will, as a rule, be regarded as a penalty merely and not as liquidated damages, and it is immaterial whether the deposit is called a penalty or liquidated damages, and particularly so when the deposit is out of all proportion to the rent due. 3. Damages, § 85*—what is important in determining whether deposit is penalty or otherwise. The element of reasonableness is an important factor in determining whether or not a deposit should be considered as a penalty or otherwise,' and if the forfeiture would be unreasonable, the entire deposit should. not be applied as liquidated damages.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Billos v. Kozlowski, 205 Ill. App. 285 (Ill. Ct. App. 1917).

205 Ill. App. 285 (Billos v. Kozlowski) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Johnson v. Englestein
236 Ill. App. 215 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1925)
Virginia Amusement Co. v. Mid-City Trust & Savings Bank
220 Ill. App. 147 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1920)