Billingsley v. Illich

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Billingsley v. Illich

272 A.D.2d 1063

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 10, 1947

StatusPublished

This text of 272 A.D.2d 1063 (Billingsley v. Illich) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Billingsley v. Illich, 272 A.D.2d 1063 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1947).

Pincite

Opinion

Action for specific performance in respect of real property which is the subject of a joint venture of the plaintiff and defendant. After joinder of issue, plaintiff moved for judgment under rule 112, or, in the alternative, for partial summary judgment under rule 114 of the Rules of Civil Practice, and the motion was denied. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Hag-arty, Acting P. J., Carswell, Adel and Sneed, JJ., concur; Nolan, J., not voting. [See 273 App. Div. 785.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Action for specific performance in respect of real property which is the subject of a joint venture of the plaintiff and defendant. After joinder of issue, plaintiff moved for judgment under rule 112, or, in the alternative, for partial summary judgment under rule 114 of the Rules of Civil Practice, and the motion was denied. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Hag-arty, Acting P. J., Carswell, Adel and Sneed, JJ., concur; Nolan, J., not voting. [See 273 App. Div. 785.]

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

272 A.D.2d 1063, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/billingsley-v-illich-nyappdiv-1947.