Billingsley v. Flynt

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Billingsley v. Flynt

87 S.E. 692, 17 Ga. App. 469, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 699

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJanuary 11, 1916

Docket6464

StatusPublished

This text of 87 S.E. 692 (Billingsley v. Flynt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Billingsley v. Flynt, 87 S.E. 692, 17 Ga. App. 469, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 699 (Ga. Ct. App. 1916).

Pincite

Opinion

Broyles, J.

1. The evidence introduced, with all reasonable deductions and inferences therefrom, did not demand a verdict for the plaintiff for the full amount sued for; and the direction of such a. verdict by the trial judge was error.

2. The appellate division of the municipal court of Atlanta erred in sustaining the judgment of the trial court, and in overruling the motion fer a new trial. Judgment reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Broyles, J.

1. The evidence introduced, with all reasonable deductions and inferences therefrom, did not demand a verdict for the plaintiff for the full amount sued for; and the direction of such a. verdict by the trial judge was error.

2. The appellate division of the municipal court of Atlanta erred in sustaining the judgment of the trial court, and in overruling the motion fer a new trial. Judgment reversed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

87 S.E. 692, 17 Ga. App. 469, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 699, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/billingsley-v-flynt-gactapp-1916.