Billingslea v. State

341 S.E.2d 305, 177 Ga. App. 775, 1986 Ga. App. LEXIS 1540
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedFebruary 11, 1986
Docket71927
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 341 S.E.2d 305 (Billingslea v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Billingslea v. State, 341 S.E.2d 305, 177 Ga. App. 775, 1986 Ga. App. LEXIS 1540 (Ga. Ct. App. 1986).

Opinion

Birdsong, Presiding Judge.

Grady Billingslea was indicted and convicted in Troup County State Court for driving under the influence (DUI). The defendant moved to dismiss on grounds that the state court, which has jurisdiction of misdemeanors, did not have jurisdiction since DUI is a felony, one year being the maximum punishment for the offense under OCGA § 40-6-391. After conviction and post-trial proceedings, Billingslea appeals. Held:

OCGA § 40-6-391 (c) provides that persons convicted of DUI shall be guilty of a misdemeanor. Notwithstanding this clear pronouncement, appellant contends the offense is a felony because the maximum prison sentence that may be imposed is one year, whereas under OCGA § 17-10-3 misdemeanors are by law punished by a maximum sentence of “twelve months.” OCGA § 17-10-3 (a) provides: “Except as otherwise provided by law, every crime declared to be a misdemeanor shall be punished: . . . [by confinement not to exceed [776]*77612 months].” Appellant contends and infers from various authorities that the sentence required by § 40-6-391, a maximum of one year, is a term which in this state exclusively connotes a felony offense; but this code section proves that contention to be wrong, since it gives the maximum sentence of “one year” and expressly provides the offense as a misdemeanor. No ground exists as claimed to reverse the judgment of the trial court.

Decided February 11, 1986. Hoke J. Thomas, Jr., for appellant. Robert B. Whatley, Solicitor, for appellee.

Judgment affirmed.

Banke, C. J., and Sognier, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Anthony Garza
236 F. App'x 468 (Eleventh Circuit, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
341 S.E.2d 305, 177 Ga. App. 775, 1986 Ga. App. LEXIS 1540, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/billingslea-v-state-gactapp-1986.