Billings v. State
This text of 1919 OK CR 68 (Billings v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Plaintiffs in error, B. M. and George Billings, were jointly tried and convicted on an information charging that they did keep a place in the city of Enid, with the felonious intent and 'purpose of selling intoxicating liquors. To reverse the judgments rendered in accordance with the verdict, an appeal was perfected by filing in this court, on July 17, 1917, a petition in error with case-made attached.
In the case of Proctor v. State, 15 Okla. Cr. 338, 176 Pac. 771, the statute upon which the prosecution in this case was based was hela unconstitutional and void. For the reasons stated in the opinion in the Proctor Case, the judgments appealed from are reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1919 OK CR 68, 178 P. 688, 15 Okla. Crim. 685, 1919 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 49, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/billings-v-state-oklacrimapp-1919.