Billings v. Skutt
This text of 1 Johns. Cas. 105 (Billings v. Skutt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
It appearing that the defendant obtained such discharge, the plaintiff, if he meant to contest its validity, ought to have brought a suit in the ordinary [*106] course, *on.the bond. The judgment is a surprise on the defendant, and must, .therefore, be set aside.
Rule granted. '
See Baker v. The Judges of the Ulster Common Pleas, 4 Johns. R. 191. Palmer v. Hutchins, 1 Cowen, 42. Mabbott v. Van Beuren, id. 44, n. (b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1 Johns. Cas. 105, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/billings-v-skutt-nysupct-1799.