Billings v. Roadhouse
5 Cal. 71
Opinion
Murray, C. J., concurred.
The County Court dismissed the appeal on the ground that the appeal bond was defective. The defect pointed out is so trifling, that the obligation of the bond would not be affected by it. Even if it were otherwise, the Court should have given the party leave to file a good bond.
The judgment is reversed, and the cause remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Billings v. Roadhouse, 5 Cal. 71 (Cal. 1855).
5 Cal. 71 (Billings v. Roadhouse) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Cohen v. Connick
147 P. 479 (California Court of Appeal, 1915)
Towle v. Bradley
50 N.W. 1057 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1892)
Territory of Montana v. Milroy
7 Mont. 559 (Montana Supreme Court, 1888)
Norton v. Meader
18 F. Cas. 420 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern California, 1860)