Billingheimer v. Rickey

Ohio Superior Court, Cincinnati

Billingheimer v. Rickey

2 Cin. Sup. Ct. Rep. 492

DecidedApril 15, 1872

StatusPublished

This text of 2 Cin. Sup. Ct. Rep. 492 (Billingheimer v. Rickey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Superior Court, Cincinnati primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Billingheimer v. Rickey, 2 Cin. Sup. Ct. Rep. 492 (Ohio Super. Ct. 1872).

Pincite

Opinion

Hagans, J.

A judgment had been rendered against J. J. Rickey and R. H. Stevenson as joint debtors, and the plaintiff has issued execution against R. H. Stevenson only, and is about to levy, when said Stevenson interposes this motion.

The execution must follow the judgment, though the party may have the right to direct the execution to be levied on the property of one of the defendants for the whole debt. Slaughter v. Price, 2 J. J. Marsh. 137.

Motion granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hagans, J.

A judgment had been rendered against J. J. Rickey and R. H. Stevenson as joint debtors, and the plaintiff has issued execution against R. H. Stevenson only, and is about to levy, when said Stevenson interposes this motion.

The execution must follow the judgment, though the party may have the right to direct the execution to be levied on the property of one of the defendants for the whole debt. Slaughter v. Price, 2 J. J. Marsh. 137.

Motion granted.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2 Cin. Sup. Ct. Rep. 492, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/billingheimer-v-rickey-ohsuperctcinci-1872.