Billieson v. City of New Orleans
This text of 188 So. 3d 262 (Billieson v. City of New Orleans) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
additionally concurs and assigns reasons.
_JjI agree with the majority’s decision to deny the writ, as I believe it lacks Rule X considerations. “The appellate court re[263]*263views an award of attorney’s fees for an abuse of discretion. The district .court’s factual determinations will not be set aside absent manifest error.” Covington v. McNeese State Univ., 12-2182, p. 6 (La.5/7/13), 118 So.3d 343, 348. (citations omitted). As the applicant has demonstrated no abuse of the trial court’s discretion, I see no reason to impede the lamentably belated conclusion of this epic two-decade litigation.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
188 So. 3d 262, 2016 WL 1619909, 2016 La. LEXIS 927, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/billieson-v-city-of-new-orleans-la-2016.