Billieson v. City of New Orleans

188 So. 3d 262, 2016 WL 1619909, 2016 La. LEXIS 927
CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana
DecidedApril 15, 2016
DocketNo. 2016-C-0366
StatusPublished

This text of 188 So. 3d 262 (Billieson v. City of New Orleans) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Billieson v. City of New Orleans, 188 So. 3d 262, 2016 WL 1619909, 2016 La. LEXIS 927 (La. 2016).

Opinion

CRICHTON, J.,

additionally concurs and assigns reasons.

_JjI agree with the majority’s decision to deny the writ, as I believe it lacks Rule X considerations. “The appellate court re[263]*263views an award of attorney’s fees for an abuse of discretion. The district .court’s factual determinations will not be set aside absent manifest error.” Covington v. McNeese State Univ., 12-2182, p. 6 (La.5/7/13), 118 So.3d 343, 348. (citations omitted). As the applicant has demonstrated no abuse of the trial court’s discretion, I see no reason to impede the lamentably belated conclusion of this epic two-decade litigation.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Covington v. McNeese State University
118 So. 3d 343 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 2013)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
188 So. 3d 262, 2016 WL 1619909, 2016 La. LEXIS 927, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/billieson-v-city-of-new-orleans-la-2016.