Biller Associates v. RTE. 156 Realty Co.
734 A.2d 566, 248 Conn. 916, 1999 Conn. LEXIS 160
Opinion
The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 52 Conn. App. 18 (AC 16708), is granted, limited to the following issues:
“1. Do General Statutes (Rev. to 1987) § 38-69, now § 38a-723, and § 38-72 (h)-6, now § 38a-788-6, of the Regulations of Connecticut State Agencies, under the circumstances of this case render invalid an employment contract between a licensed public adjuster and [917]*917a property owner when the property owner was not named on the insurance policy?
“2. Did the Appellate Court improperly reverse the trial court’s judgment that under the facts of this case the plaintiff should recover in quantum meruit?”
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Biller Associates v. RTE. 156 Realty Co., 734 A.2d 566, 248 Conn. 916, 1999 Conn. LEXIS 160 (Colo. 1999).
734 A.2d 566 (Biller Associates v. RTE. 156 Realty Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Biller Associates v. Route 156 Realty Co.
746 A.2d 785 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2000)