Billen v. White
This text of 17 La. Ann. 10 (Billen v. White) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Plaintiff sued defendant to recover the sum of $1,400 with interest,- the price paid for the purchase of an unsound slave.
Defendant answered by general denial, but admitted the sale of the slave to plaintiff.
The District Judge rendered judgment in favor of plaintiff for.amount claimed, with interest.
Defendant has appealed.
Defendant, in the lower court, objected to the admission of the testimony of George W. West, proving the contents of a written instrument.
The ground of the objection was that the loss of the instrument -was not sufficiently proved.
There is positive evidence that the instrument of writing was destroyed. The evidence was properly admitted.
There is no reason to reverse the judgment of the lower court.
It is affirmed, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
17 La. Ann. 10, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/billen-v-white-la-1865.