Billboard Sportswear, Inc. v. Kapadia

237 A.D.2d 135, 655 N.Y.S.2d 354, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2368
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 11, 1997·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Carol Arber, J.), entered March 8, 1996, which granted defendants’ motion for renewal of a prior motion by plaintiff for summary judgment but adhered to the prior determination granting plaintiff’s motion as to the issue of defendants’ liability, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Defendants have never refuted documentary evidence that they agreed to pay for the subject goods and actually made payments for them. Defendants raise only immaterial issues and improperly attempt to avoid summary judgment in the hope that a question of fact will be raised in cross-examining plaintiffs witness (see, Badman v Civil Serv. Empls. Assn., 91 AD2d 858). We have considered defendants’ remaining arguments and find them to be without merit. Concur—Murphy, P. J., Williams, Tom and Mazzarelli, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Billboard Sportswear, Inc. v. Kapadia, 237 A.D.2d 135, 655 N.Y.S.2d 354, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2368 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

237 A.D.2d 135 (Billboard Sportswear, Inc. v. Kapadia) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Angeles v. Goldhirsch
268 A.D.2d 217 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)