Bill Williams Air Conditioning & Heating, Inc. v. Gentrac, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Bill Williams Air Conditioning & Heating, Inc. v. Gentrac, Inc.

565 So. 2d 832, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 5743, 1990 WL 110281

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 2, 1990·No. No. 89-2901·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The issue presented for appeal in this case requires us to review the evidence presented at trial. The trial proceedings were not transcribed, however, and, appellant was unable to provide this court with an approved statement of the evidence or proceedings as required by Rule 9.200(b)(4), Fla.R.App.P. Accordingly, because the record otherwise fails to demonstrate reversible error, we must affirm the final judgment of the lower court. Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So.2d 1150 (Fla.1979); Clayton v. Clayton, 442 So.2d 310 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983).

AFFIRMED.

BOOTH, SMITH and ZEHMER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The issue presented for appeal in this case requires us to review the evidence presented at trial. The trial proceedings were not transcribed, however, and, appellant was unable to provide this court with an approved statement of the evidence or proceedings as required by Rule 9.200(b)(4), Fla.R.App.P. Accordingly, because the record otherwise fails to demonstrate reversible error, we must affirm the final judgment of the lower court. Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So.2d 1150 (Fla.1979); Clayton v. Clayton, 442 So.2d 310 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983).

AFFIRMED.

BOOTH, SMITH and ZEHMER, JJ., concur.

Bill Williams Air Conditioning & Heating, Inc. v. Gentrac, Inc., 565 So. 2d 832, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 5743, 1990 WL 110281 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

Pincite

565 So. 2d 832 (Bill Williams Air Conditioning & Heating, Inc. v. Gentrac, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related