Bill v. Scott
This text of 1 Kirby 62 (Bill v. Scott) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Superior Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The complainant who prosecuted, as well for his own damages as for a breach of the peace, was admitted as a witness in the case — which was illegal.
And it doth not appear from the record, that the defendant was found guilty, though he was adjudged to pay damages and costs.
The defendant was bound to his good behavior, without [64]*64day, or reference to any court: "Whereas, a justice of the peace can bind, in such case, only to the next Court of Common Pleas, leaving it to the discretion of that court to continue or discharge the bonds.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1 Kirby 62, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bill-v-scott-connsuperct-1786.