Bill v. President, Directors, & Co. of Fourth Great Western Turnpike Road

14 Johns. 416
New York Supreme Court·Decided October 15, 1817·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The instrument subscribed by the defendant is not according to the form prescribed by the act incorporating this company. It must, therefore, be considered as a special contract, and some doubt might be raised with respect to the consideration; but it is unnecessary to notice it, for the plaintiffs did not make out what was necessary to show themselves duly and legally incorporated. It is a well-settled rule, that when a corporation sues on a contract, they must, at the trial, under the general issue, prove that they are a corporation. (8 Johns. Rep. 378.) In the case of the Highland Turnpike Company v. M'Kean, (10 Johns. Rep. 156.) the books and minutes of the company, legally authenticated, were deemed evidence of the proceedings of the corporation. The evidence offered on the trial was not sufficient, and the judgment must, accordingly, be reversed,

Judgment reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bill v. President, Directors, & Co. of Fourth Great Western Turnpike Road, 14 Johns. 416 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1817).

14 Johns. 416 (Bill v. President, Directors, & Co. of Fourth Great Western Turnpike Road) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bank of Port Jervis v. Darling
36 N.Y.S. 153 (New York Supreme Court, 1895)
People ex rel. Hackley v. Croton Aqueduct Board
49 Barb. 259 (New York Supreme Court, 1867)
Vicksburg Waterworks & Banking Co. v. Washington
9 Miss. 536 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1844)
Grays v. Turnpike Co.
4 Rand. 578 (Court of Appeals of Virginia, 1826)