Bill Harbert Constr. v. Cortez Byrd

169 F.3d 693
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
DecidedMarch 9, 1999
Docket98-6404
StatusPublished

This text of 169 F.3d 693 (Bill Harbert Constr. v. Cortez Byrd) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bill Harbert Constr. v. Cortez Byrd, 169 F.3d 693 (11th Cir. 1999).

Opinion

BILL HARBERT CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, a division of Bill Harbert International, Inc., Plaintiff- Counter-Defendant, Appellee,

v.

CORTEZ BYRD CHIPS, INC., Defendant-Counter-Claimant, Appellant.

No. 98-6404

Non-Argument Calendar.

United States Court of Appeals,

Eleventh Circuit.

May 5, 2000.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama (No. CV-98-G-117-S); J. Foy Guin, Jr., Judge.

ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

Before TJOFLAT and EDMONDSON, Circuit Judges, and RONEY, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

This case comes before us by order of the United States Supreme Court, which has reversed the

judgment of this Court and remanded the case for our reconsideration. See Cortez Byrd Chips, Inc. v. Bill

Harbert Constr. Co., 529 U.S. ----, 120 S.Ct. 1331, --- L.Ed.2d ---- (2000).

The judgment of the district court is, pursuant to the mandate of the Supreme Court, reversed, and

this case is remanded to the district court for further proceedings consistent with the Supreme Court's opinion.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
169 F.3d 693, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bill-harbert-constr-v-cortez-byrd-ca11-1999.