Bill Harbert Constr. v. Cortez Byrd
This text of 169 F.3d 693 (Bill Harbert Constr. v. Cortez Byrd) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
BILL HARBERT CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, a division of Bill Harbert International, Inc., Plaintiff- Counter-Defendant, Appellee,
v.
CORTEZ BYRD CHIPS, INC., Defendant-Counter-Claimant, Appellant.
No. 98-6404
Non-Argument Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals,
Eleventh Circuit.
May 5, 2000.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama (No. CV-98-G-117-S); J. Foy Guin, Jr., Judge.
ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
Before TJOFLAT and EDMONDSON, Circuit Judges, and RONEY, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
This case comes before us by order of the United States Supreme Court, which has reversed the
judgment of this Court and remanded the case for our reconsideration. See Cortez Byrd Chips, Inc. v. Bill
Harbert Constr. Co., 529 U.S. ----, 120 S.Ct. 1331, --- L.Ed.2d ---- (2000).
The judgment of the district court is, pursuant to the mandate of the Supreme Court, reversed, and
this case is remanded to the district court for further proceedings consistent with the Supreme Court's opinion.
REVERSED AND REMANDED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
169 F.3d 693, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bill-harbert-constr-v-cortez-byrd-ca11-1999.