Bill Boyd Kuhn v. State

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Bill Boyd Kuhn v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2013 Tex. App. LEXIS 1038
Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided January 31, 2013·No. 03-11-00041-CR·Published

Opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED JANUARY 31, 2013

NO. 03-11-00041-CR

Bill Boyd Kuhn, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM 207TH DISTRICT COURT OF COMAL COUNTY BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE JONES, JUSTICES PEMBERTON AND ROSE AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE PEMBERTON; CONCURRING AND DISSENTING OPINION BY CHIEF JUSTICE JONES

THIS CAUSE came on to be heard on the record of the court below, and the same being

considered, because it is the opinion of this Court that there was no error in the district court’s

judgment: IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED by the Court that the judgment

of the district court is in all things affirmed; and it appearing that the appellant is indigent and

unable to pay costs, that no adjudication as to costs is made; and that this decision be certified

below for observance.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bill Boyd Kuhn v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2013).

Bill Boyd Kuhn v. State (Bill Boyd Kuhn v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.