Bilk v. Pfaudler Co.
236 A.D. 884
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 15, 1932
StatusPublished
This text of 236 A.D. 884 (Bilk v. Pfaudler Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Bilk v. Pfaudler Co., 236 A.D. 884 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1932).
Opinion
In each case order is affirmed pursuant to stipulation that the parties would be bound by the decisions of this court in the case of List v. Eastman Kodak Company [ante, p. 820] and Bogdan v. Pfaudler Company [ante, p. 822], All concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
236 A.D. 884, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bilk-v-pfaudler-co-nyappdiv-1932.