Bilderback v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Bilderback v. State

888 S.W.2d 290, 318 Ark. 323, 1994 Ark. LEXIS 602

CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas

DecidedOctober 17, 1994

DocketCR 94-1034

StatusPublished

This text of 888 S.W.2d 290 (Bilderback v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bilderback v. State, 888 S.W.2d 290, 318 Ark. 323, 1994 Ark. LEXIS 602 (Ark. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Gloria Jean Bilderback, by her attorney, Gene O’Daniel, has filed a motion for a rule on the clerk. Her attorney, Gene O’Daniel, admits by motion that the record was tendered late due to a mistake on his part.

We find that such an error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964 (1979) (per curiam).

The motion is therefore granted. A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Gloria Jean Bilderback, by her attorney, Gene O’Daniel, has filed a motion for a rule on the clerk. Her attorney, Gene O’Daniel, admits by motion that the record was tendered late due to a mistake on his part.

We find that such an error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964 (1979) (per curiam).

The motion is therefore granted. A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

888 S.W.2d 290, 318 Ark. 323, 1994 Ark. LEXIS 602, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bilderback-v-state-ark-1994.