Bilderback v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Bilderback v. State

888 S.W.2d 290, 318 Ark. 323, 1994 Ark. LEXIS 602

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Bilderback v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 319 Ark. 643 →

Supreme Court of Arkansas·Decided October 17, 1994·No. CR 94-1034·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Gloria Jean Bilderback, by her attorney, Gene O’Daniel, has filed a motion for a rule on the clerk. Her attorney, Gene O’Daniel, admits by motion that the record was tendered late due to a mistake on his part.

We find that such an error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964 (1979) (per curiam).

The motion is therefore granted. A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Gloria Jean Bilderback, by her attorney, Gene O’Daniel, has filed a motion for a rule on the clerk. Her attorney, Gene O’Daniel, admits by motion that the record was tendered late due to a mistake on his part.

We find that such an error, admittedly made by the attorney for a criminal defendant, is good cause to grant the motion. See In Re: Belated Appeals in Criminal Cases, 265 Ark. 964 (1979) (per curiam).

The motion is therefore granted. A copy of this opinion will be forwarded to the Committee on Professional Conduct.

Bilderback v. State, 888 S.W.2d 290, 318 Ark. 323, 1994 Ark. LEXIS 602 (Ark. 1994).

Pincite

888 S.W.2d 290 (Bilderback v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.