Bilderback & Elwell v. Hinchman

14 N.J.L. 570
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedFebruary 15, 1835
StatusPublished

This text of 14 N.J.L. 570 (Bilderback & Elwell v. Hinchman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bilderback & Elwell v. Hinchman, 14 N.J.L. 570 (N.J. 1835).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The statute requires that the defendant and his security should/om in a confession of judgment to the adverse party. This can only be done by the parties appearing personally before the justice and there jointly confessing such judgment. The judgment therefore in this case against Elwell v. Bilderback, must be set aside and reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
14 N.J.L. 570, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bilderback-elwell-v-hinchman-nj-1835.