Bilby v. Roberts

1918 OK 147, 171 P. 713, 68 Okla. 57, 1918 Okla. LEXIS 286
CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma
DecidedMarch 12, 1918
Docket8633
StatusPublished

This text of 1918 OK 147 (Bilby v. Roberts) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bilby v. Roberts, 1918 OK 147, 171 P. 713, 68 Okla. 57, 1918 Okla. LEXIS 286 (Okla. 1918).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This cause comes on to be heard upon the motion of the defendants in error 'to dismiss the appeal filed herein, upon the ground that “plaintiffs in error have not filed brief within the time required by law and the rules of this court.”

The records show that this cause was set for submission upon the merits on the 12th day of February, 1918; that upon said date no brief had been filed by the plaintiffs in error, nor cause shown for the failure to file at that time. No brief on behalf of either party has since been filed. In Dykes v. Markham, 44 Okla. 669, 146 Pac. 434, the syllabus reads:

“No briefs having been filed on behalf of the plaintiff in error, nor cause shown for the failure to file at the time the cause is assigned for submission, the appeal will be treated as abandoned, and accordingly dismissed.”

To the same effect is El Reno Vit. Brick & T. Co. v. Raymond Co., 44 Okla. 676, 146 Pac. 21.

Upon the authority of these eases the appeal herein is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dykes v. Markham
1915 OK 62 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1915)
El Reno Vitrified Brick & Tile Co. v. C. W. Raymond Co.
1915 OK 55 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1915)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1918 OK 147, 171 P. 713, 68 Okla. 57, 1918 Okla. LEXIS 286, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bilby-v-roberts-okla-1918.