Bilal v. Carroll

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: January 27, 2003
• Docket: 02-7679
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-7679

SHATEEK AMIN BILAL,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

DAVID CARROLL; THOMAS AKER; DENNIS VANBUREN; ALBERT PRADO; WILLIAM WESLEY; TONY JONES; CORRECTIONAL OFFICER CHAPPELL; CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION DUNKLEY,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief District Judge. (CA-02-287-5-BO)

Submitted: January 16, 2003 Decided: January 27, 2003

Before WILLIAMS, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Shateek Amin Bilal, Appellant Pro Se. Mary S. Mercer, Assistant Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Shateek Amin Bilal appeals the district court’s order

dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint without prejudice

for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. We have reviewed

the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on

the reasoning of the district court. See Bilal v. Carroll, No.

CA-02-287-5-BO (E.D.N.C. Oct. 22, 2002). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED