Bilal v. Carroll

Fourth Circuit

Bilal v. Carroll

55 F. App'x 170

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided January 27, 2003·No. No. 02-7679·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Shateek Amin Bilal appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint without prejudice for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Bilal v. Carroll, No. CA-02-287-5-BO (E.D.N.C. Oct. 22, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Shateek Amin Bilal appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint without prejudice for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Bilal v. Carroll, No. CA-02-287-5-BO (E.D.N.C. Oct. 22, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Bilal v. Carroll, 55 F. App'x 170 (4th Cir. 2003).

Pincite

55 F. App'x 170 (Bilal v. Carroll) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related