Bikkani v. Lee

892 N.E.2d 919, 119 Ohio St. 3d 1429
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedAugust 26, 2008
Docket2008-1677
StatusPublished

This text of 892 N.E.2d 919 (Bikkani v. Lee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bikkani v. Lee, 892 N.E.2d 919, 119 Ohio St. 3d 1429 (Ohio 2008).

Opinion

Cuyahoga App. No. 89312, 2008-0hio-3130. On March 5, 2007, this court found Prasad Bikkani to be a vexatious litigator under S.Ct.Prae.R. XIV(5)(B). This court further ordered that Bikkani was prohibited from continuing or instituting legal proceedings in this court without first obtaining leave. On August 21, 2008, Bikkani submitted a notice of appeal and memorandum in support of jurisdiction but failed to first seek leave of the court. Upon consideration thereof,

It is ordered by the court, sua sponte, that the notice of appeal and memorandum in support of jurisdiction are hereby stricken. Accordingly, this cause is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
892 N.E.2d 919, 119 Ohio St. 3d 1429, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bikkani-v-lee-ohio-2008.