Home/Supreme Court of Colorado/Bijou Irrigation District v. Hinderlider

Bijou Irrigation District v. Hinderlider

43 P.2d 172, 96 Colo. 427
CourtSupreme Court of Colorado
DecidedApril 1, 1935
DocketNo. 13,359.
StatusPublished

This text of 43 P.2d 172 (Bijou Irrigation District v. Hinderlider) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Colorado primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Bijou Irrigation District v. Hinderlider, 43 P.2d 172, 96 Colo. 427 (Colo. 1935).

Opinion

Mr. Justice Bouck

delivered the opinion of the court.

This case in its facts and law is closely parallel with, and is ruled by, case No. 13,358, Riverside Reservoir and Land Company v. Hinderlider, just decided, 96 Colo. 425, 43 P. (2d) 171. The Bijou Irrigation District as plaintiff in error in No. 13,359 filed a separate record and separate assignments of error; but the case was briefed and orally argued jointly with No. 13,358 upon a common abstract of the record.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Riverside Reservoir & Land Co. v. Hinderlider
43 P.2d 171 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1935)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
43 P.2d 172, 96 Colo. 427, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bijou-irrigation-district-v-hinderlider-colo-1935.