Bignon v. Bignon
This text of 42 S.E.2d 426 (Bignon v. Bignon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The exception here is to a judgment awarding custody of a minor child to its mother. The father contends that the judgment is contrary to the evidence and an abuse of the discretion vested in the trial judge. Held:
Where the trial judge in awarding custody of a minor child as between divorced parents, as was the ease here, exercises a sound legal discretion, his judgment in making an award will not be controlled by this court. Code, §§ 30-127, 74-107; McDowell v. Gould, 166 Ga. 670 (144 S. E. 206). While the evidence in the instant case respecting the fitness of the respective father and mother was in conflict, it can not be said as a matter of law that the trial judge abused the discretion vested in him. Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
42 S.E.2d 426, 202 Ga. 141, 1947 Ga. LEXIS 376, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bignon-v-bignon-ga-1947.