Bignon v. Bignon

42 S.E.2d 426, 202 Ga. 141, 1947 Ga. LEXIS 376
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided April 17, 1947·No. No. 15741.·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Candler, Justice.

The exception here is to a judgment awarding custody of a minor child to its mother. The father contends that the judgment is contrary to the evidence and an abuse of the discretion vested in the trial judge. Held:

Where the trial judge in awarding custody of a minor child as between divorced parents, as was the ease here, exercises a sound legal discretion, his judgment in making an award will not be controlled by this court. Code, §§ 30-127, 74-107; McDowell v. Gould, 166 Ga. 670 (144 S. E. 206). While the evidence in the instant case respecting the fitness of the respective father and mother was in conflict, it can not be said as a matter of law that the trial judge abused the discretion vested in him. Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur. *142 Pierce Brothers, for plaintiff. W. B. Lanier, for defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bignon v. Bignon, 42 S.E.2d 426, 202 Ga. 141, 1947 Ga. LEXIS 376 (Ga. 1947).

42 S.E.2d 426 (Bignon v. Bignon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Everritt v. Everritt
122 S.E.2d 920 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1961)
Speer v. Speer
122 S.E.2d 84 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1961)
Harbuck v. Harbuck
78 S.E.2d 508 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1953)
Brannen v. Brannen
65 S.E.2d 161 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1951)
Adams v. Adams
59 S.E.2d 366 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1950)