Bigner v. Hodges

82 Miss. 215
Mississippi Supreme Court·Decided March 15, 1903·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Calhoon, J.,

delivered the opinion, of the court.

It is questionable whether any amendment of the declaration was needed, but, if it was, the¡ allowance of it was proper. We think there was no material variance between the allegata and probata. The words are practically synonymous.

' The doctrine of privileged communications cannot afford shelter. The mayor and the marshal were not the only persons to whom the words were spoken, and, even as to them, the defendant himself testified that he met them casually and made his statement to them. It is difficult to believe that it was for the public good he designed the communication. The jury did not believe that it was, and the verdict for $150 is not excessive.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bigner v. Hodges, 82 Miss. 215 (Mich. 1903).

82 Miss. 215 (Bigner v. Hodges) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Downtown Grill, Inc. v. Connell
721 So. 2d 1113 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1998)
Downtown Grill Inc v. Michael Connell
Mississippi Supreme Court, 1996
Otten v. Schutt
113 N.W.2d 152 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1962)
Elms v. Crane
107 A. 852 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1919)