Biglow v. State

683 So. 2d 176, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 11954, 1996 WL 661732
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 13, 1996·No. No. 95-2647·Published

Opinion

CONFESSION OF ERROR

PER CURIAM.

The defendant, Lafayette Biglow, appeals an order denying his motion for judgment of acquittal. We reverse based upon the State’s proper confession of error.

Where a defendant is charged with unlawful display of a firearm during the commission of a felony and found not guilty by reason of insanity of the underlying felony, a [177]*177conviction for display of the firearm cannot stand and an acquittal must be entered. See State v. Powell, 674 So.2d 781 (Fla.1996); Redondo v. State, 408 So.2d 954 (Fla.1981); Ayrado v. State, 431 So.2d 320 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983).

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Biglow v. State, 683 So. 2d 176, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 11954, 1996 WL 661732 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

683 So. 2d 176 (Biglow v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ayrado v. State
431 So. 2d 320 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1983)
Ticor Title Guarantee Co. v. Harbin
674 So. 2d 781 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)
Jordan v. Jordan
408 So. 2d 952 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1981)