Biglow v. State
Opinion
CONFESSION OF ERROR
The defendant, Lafayette Biglow, appeals an order denying his motion for judgment of acquittal. We reverse based upon the State’s proper confession of error.
Where a defendant is charged with unlawful display of a firearm during the commission of a felony and found not guilty by reason of insanity of the underlying felony, a [177]*177conviction for display of the firearm cannot stand and an acquittal must be entered. See State v. Powell, 674 So.2d 781 (Fla.1996); Redondo v. State, 408 So.2d 954 (Fla.1981); Ayrado v. State, 431 So.2d 320 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983).
Reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
683 So. 2d 176 (Biglow v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.