Bigler v. Department of Banking & Finance

392 So. 2d 249, 1979 Fla. LEXIS 4599
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided March 8, 1979·No. No. 54767·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We accepted jurisdiction in this case under the provisions of article V, section 3(b)(1), Florida Constitution. After briefing and oral argument we are convinced that the trial court ruled that it did not have jurisdiction of the subject matter of this suit. Therefore, the trial court’s ruling on the constitutionality of the statutes under consideration is null and void.

Such a void ruling is incapable of vesting this court with jurisdiction as contemplated by the constitution.

Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed.

ENGLAND, C. J., and BOYD, OVER-TON, SUNDBERG, HATCHETT and ALDERMAN, JJ., concur. ADKINS, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bigler v. Department of Banking & Finance, 392 So. 2d 249, 1979 Fla. LEXIS 4599 (Fla. 1979).

392 So. 2d 249 (Bigler v. Department of Banking & Finance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Marshall v. Johnson
392 So. 2d 249 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1980)