Bigham v. Napier
92 S.E. 761, 20 Ga. App. 143, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 754
Opinion
This was a suit in trover for the recovery of certain bales of cotton and $39 in money, or its value. Under the facts of the ease, and the rulings in McEllumnon v. Farmers Alliance Co., 95 Ga. 670 (22 S. E. 686), McLennan v. Livingston, 108 Ca. 342 (33 S. E. 974), Brooke v. Lowe, 122 Ca. 358 (50 S. E. 146), Collins v. West, 5 Ga. App. 429 (63 S. E. 540), and Peeples v. Felton, 14 Ga. App. 5 (80 S. E.21), the court did not err in awarding a nonsuit.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Bigham v. Napier, 92 S.E. 761, 20 Ga. App. 143, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 754 (Ga. Ct. App. 1917).
92 S.E. 761 (Bigham v. Napier) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
McElhannon v. Farmers Alliance Warehouse & Commission Co.
95 Ga. 670 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1895)
McLennan v. Livingston
33 S.E. 974 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1899)
Brooke v. Lowe
50 S.E. 146 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1905)
Collins v. West
63 S.E. 540 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1909)
Peeples v. Felton
80 S.E. 21 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1913)