Bigham v. Napier
This text of 92 S.E. 761 (Bigham v. Napier) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This was a suit in trover for the recovery of certain bales of cotton and $39 in money, or its value. Under the facts of the ease, and the rulings in McEllumnon v. Farmers Alliance Co., 95 Ga. 670 (22 S. E. 686), McLennan v. Livingston, 108 Ca. 342 (33 S. E. 974), Brooke v. Lowe, 122 Ca. 358 (50 S. E. 146), Collins v. West, 5 Ga. App. 429 (63 S. E. 540), and Peeples v. Felton, 14 Ga. App. 5 (80 S. E.21), the court did not err in awarding a nonsuit.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
92 S.E. 761, 20 Ga. App. 143, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 754, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bigham-v-napier-gactapp-1917.