Bigham v. Citizens & Southern Bank

125 S.E. 381, 159 Ga. 305, 1924 Ga. LEXIS 437
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided November 22, 1924·No. No. 4313·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Beck, P. J.

Where an equitable petition is filed, and the prayers of the petition are that the sheriff, who has levied a certain .fi. fa. upon the property in question, and the plaintiff in fi. fa. be enjoined from proceeding to sell the property under the fi. fa. and the levy made, and that the verdict and judgment upon which the fi. fa. issued be declared void, and a further prayer for general relief, and the court, at the interlocutory hearing, refuses an interlocutory injunction, and thereupon the act sought to bo restrained (that is, the sale of the property under the fi. fa.) is performed and completed, the court having refused to grant a supersedeas, the judgment of the court refusing the injunction will not be reversed, inasmuch as the question as to whether the injunction to restrain the sale should have'been granted has become a moot question. Consequently the bill of exceptions will be dismissed.

Writ of error dismissed.

All the Justices concur, except Gilbert, J., disqualified.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bigham v. Citizens & Southern Bank, 125 S.E. 381, 159 Ga. 305, 1924 Ga. LEXIS 437 (Ga. 1924).

125 S.E. 381 (Bigham v. Citizens & Southern Bank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hagans v. Excelsior Electric Membership Corp.
60 S.E.2d 162 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1950)